Page 167 - Kỷ yếu hội thảo quốc tế: Ứng dụng công nghệ mới trong công trình xanh - lần thứ 9 (ATiGB 2024)
P. 167

158                              TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC SƯ PHẠM KỸ THUẬT - ĐẠI HỌC ĐÀ NẴNG

                  The  Zn/LFP  pouch  cell  is  assembled  using  zinc   attributed to capacitive-controlled mechanisms at sweep
               foil  and  carbon  cloth  combined  with  LiFePO 4.  The   rates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 1.0, 1.5 and
               cyclic  voltammetry  (CV)  curves  for  the  Zn/LFP   2.5 mV/s, respectively (Fig. 3d).
               battery, recorded at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s, exhibit a
               pair of redox peaks within the potential range of 0.8
               to 1.6 V (Fig. 3a). This redox peak pair is observed at
               1.12  V/1.35  V  under  the  same  scan  rate,
               corresponding to the following reaction:
                     Cathode: LiFePO4 →Li +e +FePO4              (1)
                                        +
                                           -
                             2+
                                   -
                     Anode: Zn  + 2e  → Zn                                (2)
                  The  total  area  under  the  curve  encompasses  both
               Faradaic and non-Faradaic charge storage mechanisms,
               including double-layer capacitive effects. The Faradaic
               process itself can be further categorized into two distinct
               components: (i) the insertion of Li ions and (ii) charge
               transfer linked to surface particles, which is referred to as
               the  pseudo-capacitance  effect.  The  term  'capacitive'
               encompasses  all  surface  charge  storage  mechanisms,
               such as double-layer and pseudo-capacitance effects. To
               estimate the “capacitive” behavior, one can analyze the
               power law connection between current (i) and scan rates
               (v) and calculate the 'b-value' from the linear slope of the
               log i versus log v plot:                        Fig. 3. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves recorded
                     i = av                                                                  (3)   at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s across five cycles,
                         b
                                                               (b) CV curves obtained at various scan rates ranging
                  According to the literature, two distinct fixed values
               of  b  are  commonly  mentioned:  0.5  and  1.0  [10]  [11],   from 0.1 to 2.5 mV/s, (c) CV curves depicting the
               representing   diffusion-controlled   and   capacitive   distinction between the total current (solid line) and
               responses, respectively. Fig. 3b shows the CV curves at   surface current (shaded area) at a scan rate of
               various scan rates: 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8,   0.1 mV/s, and (d) A comparison of capacitive versus
               1.0, 1.5, and 2.5 mV/s. The area and peaks of the CV        diffusion contributions
               curve expand as the scan rate increases.
                  Building  on  the  previous  discussion,  Dunn  et  al.
               proposed a computational method to effectively analyze
               various  components  such  as  surface  capacitance  and
               diffusion control, quantifying their contributions  to the
               total current. This method separates the current response
               into  surface-capacitive  (i-capacitive)  and  diffusion-
               controlled ( i-diffusion) effects, which can be described
               by the following equations [10] [11]:                  Fig. 4. Results of the measurement
                                                                 (a) charging and discharging and (b) capacity
                        i =   k +   k  1/2                       stability over 80 cycles at a current rate of 0.5C
                          1v   2v
                         =   i  +   i  or   /i v 1/2                       (4)   Fig.  4  illustrates  the  charging  and  discharging
                          capacitive  diffusion               process of a hybrid battery in a 4M ZnCl 2 + 3M LiCl
                         =   k v 1/2  +     k                 electrolyte with a voltage range from 0.8V to 1.6V at
                          1      2                            a  current  rate  of  0.5C  (1C  =  170  mA/g).  The
                  Equation (4) is reformulated based on the linear form   theoretical capacity of LFP is 170 mAh/g. In the first
               y = ax + b, with the y-axis denoting i/v^1/2 and the x-  cycle,  the  charging  capacity  reached  120  mAh/g,
               axis representing v^1/2. The parameters k1 and k2 are   while  the  discharging  capacity  was  only  112.5
               obtained from the slope and intercept of this line. After   mAh/g.  This  discrepancy  may  be  due  to  zinc  ions
               these calculations, the “capacitive” behavior across the   (from  ZnCl2  salt)  and  lithium  ions  (from  LiFePO 4
               full potential range is assessed and presented in Fig. 3c   material)  moving  and  depositing  on  the  negative
               for a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s, as indicated by the shaded   electrode  (zinc  metal)  during  charging,  and  during
               pink area. Comparing this shielded region with the total   discharging, the lithium ions do not fully return to the
               stored  charge  that  approximately  17.04%,  24.85%,   LFP  structure,  resulting  in  a  lower  discharging
               32.29%,  38.41%,  43.54%,  48.29%,  51.02%,  53.70%,   capacity.  The  coulombic  efficiency  was  93.75%.
               58.12%, 64.89%,  and 68.44% of the charge  storage  is   After 80 cycles, the battery exhibited a high-capacity

               ISBN: 978-604-80-9779-0
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172